Editorial policy
Golden Wellness Review aims to make wellness topics clearer without overstating what is known. Our articles distinguish factual explanation, interpretation and opinion, and keep general information separate from personal health advice.
Accuracy and care
We check wording, definitions and the context of claims before publication, and take care not to make an uncertain point sound settled. When a subject calls for individual medical judgment, we say so rather than presenting an article as a substitute for a qualified professional.
Independence
Editorial decisions belong to the publication. A partner relationship does not buy favourable coverage or control an article's conclusions, and relevant relationships are disclosed where readers encounter the material.
Corrections
If a reader spots an error, they can contact us with the article title and the passage in question. We review correction requests, amend verified errors and make the nature of a substantive correction clear in the article.
Partner material and illustrations
Paid or partner material is labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial work. Some illustrations are AI-generated; when used, they are identified as such and are not presented as documentary photographs.
Curiosity before certainty
Wellbeing is personal, and claims about it deserve context. We ask what a claim means, what supports it and where its limits lie.